Is this the best religion?

More on the Bahai later... in the meantime read these words carefully. Dwell on their them. Is there another language that could better express this sentiment? Many claim to live by them. But do they really? Just once wince of recollection fails their doctrine.

Non, rien de rien
Non, je ne regrette rien
Ni le bien qu'on m'a fait, ni le mal
Tout ca m'est bien égal
Non, rien de rien
Non, je ne regrette rien
C'est payé, balayé, oublié
Je me fous du passé
Avec mes souvenirs
J'ai allumé le feu
Mes chagrins, mes plaisirs
Je n'ai plus besoin d'eux
Balayés mes amours
Avec leurs trémolos
Balayés pour toujours
Je repars à zéro

Non, rien de rien
Non, je ne regrette rien
Ni le bien qu'on m'a fait, ni le mal
Tout ca m'est bien égal
Non, rien de rien
Non, je ne regrette rien
Car ma vie
Car mes joies
Aujourd'hui
Ça commence avec toi...

Best religion (interlude)

Oh, the suspense...

Best religion (part two)

Before I forget. In the section on Islam below I need to add its two saving graces. Sufism and surrender. The best thing about Islam is this.

Lie on your back. Bear in mind that (apparently) the proportional size of human beings represents the half way point between the smallest thing there is and the biggest. Now zoom in your thoughts on something small, like an ant, and then imagine an ants eyes, then the components of an ants eyes. Then its molecules, its atoms, its electrons etc. Stop, zoom out, go past yourself to the room you are in, the house, the city, the country, the continent, the globe, the solar system, the universe. Do this consciously and slowly. Then ask yourself - given that such complexity, magnitude and details is uncomprehensible to me, do I have any other alternative than to surrender before its glory. Recognise my utter insignificance. This is part of Islam.

Sufism, popular in parts of the Islamic world, takes this logic a stage further and introduces various exercises to develop this understanding and therefore place useful limits on self obsession, me-ness and ego.

Added to this, fasting is a very useful activity.

So yes, there are bits of Islam that are great.

It falls down on the bits that are bedded in real historical moments. Because its followers were warriors their momentary battles mix with the universal message. Like Christianity, it converted through the sword. And still tries to.

Oh, Paradox was going to talk about the Bahai...

There is always a tomorrow.

Best religion

So, what the best religion? It must be plausible, universal, peaceful, useful.

Yes, I start from the premise that we need one and add the rider that I am entitled to change my mind at any time without notice.

In reverse order:

Christianity. Sorry, not plausible. The Holy Trinity does not stand up to comparison with its competitors. The virgin birth and its consequences leave too much muddy doubt for a truly universal doctrine. And there are problems with Jesus, his historicity not his teachings - see other Paradox posts from last year. It is not truly universal and has had to modify itself beyond all recognition in order to make itself relevant to different people (though that could be a strength as well). It has been spread by violence. It has not managed to stop conflict, and indeed has been a cause of conflict between its various canons. Name me a prominent Christian that turns the other cheek. And what was that about the speck in the eye... ? How quickly we forget. To its believers (and semi believers) the idea of a nice man with a beard gives them a warm glow and feeling of usness. But the others do not see it that way. Fundamentally though, it fails because it is too contrived.

Judaism. Getting better. A far more plausible and universal concept of God. Only there is one problem. After magnaminously creating this wonderful world, why oh why did He have to choose a people as his favourites? Was this an act of spite? A feeling that after creating something so perfect, He just needed to over spice the pot a bit, stir things up a bit. Consequences are that Judaism ends up being even more specific and non universal than Christianity, in spite of the universality of the 10 commandments. Its spin off, Zionism, then muddies nationality, ethnicity and religion and zooms them all in on the walls of Jericho. It all sounds far too parochial for me. What does Judaism have to say to the Chinese bicycle rider or the Bolivian Llama shepherd?

Islam. Better still. Keeps Abrahams universal God, keeps the ten commandments and keeps Jesus, but without the miracles. One advantage is that it does not go in for miracles. To me, the Islamic God is plausable and the basic tenets are universal. The problem is that rather than depending on someone lost in the mists of time like Moses, or a mythical figure like Jesus, they go for a real person as the last messenger. A person so real that we can even trace his descendents (and God knows how they try). This individual did some wonderful things, married a divorcee businesswoman, was very pro feminist (for the times), and gave women the rights of inheritance etc. But... he also led military campaigns and used his religion to do so... leading to certain passages that we are still living with today. Conclusion - nearly there but falls down on the last two criteria.

Bahai... Aha, now we are getting somewhere. More on this tomorrow dear reader, including more reading.

Why?

Why does this blog exist? Paradox wants to test himself, that why.

Always up for a challenge, he has wryly observed rising former sparring partners, college contempories and even (occasional) drinking buddies.

Some write extremely well, others churn out the usual cliched tripe. The latter category often parroting "left must adapt" - vainly blinded to their own pre-historicicity: Maintaining into middle age that mascarade of world weariness thinly veiling their unmatured late adolocescent pseudo ironic sarcastic fossilised philosophy. How can they maintain such unaffected vacuity into middle age? Strange... did they live?

Two noble columnistic giants set the bar very high, one living... one dead. Fine prose indeed!

So, how do they do it? Can one compose a page of interesting prose? A page a day, a generally consumed diary.

Lord Gnome hires Polly Filla. Manchester Graundiad uses her namesake. Others recruit Copian Pastit or play gerismo whilst twiddling thumbs.

Paradox knows no such devices. Promising to think till it hurts here will posit spewed vocab.

Sometimes pure shit, maybe just the once something worth reading. Read on...dear reader, read on.

Paradox is a happy pessimist pondering plying prayful affiliation.

Which religion will he choose? Lets explore this tomorrow.

In the meantime, some homework - Paradox on Jesus (scroll down to see).

Handover

How was it for you?

Pleased it is over?

Or want it to go on and on?

Did you even notice it has gone?

Do you know what's going on?

(I know what's going on. I'm going on - Paradox courtesy of Harold Wilson)

Reflection on blighty past and present. Read it aloud:

Those were the days, those excellent eighties.

Extremes. Exciting pain.

War on home front.

"The Enemy Within"

Thatcher phenomenon: Polarised years. Polaroid photos. Polarised speeches. Picket line pictures. Touremburg conferences. Something else.

Yuppies too. London abuzz, housing bubbles, champagne bottles, City City bang bang. Rich and happy.

Eighties yuppies ideologically sharp. Storm troopers. Change crusade.

Yes, lets argue. Nasty is the new nice. Yes, lets think. Come over here and say that.

Yes, lets talk. Why fence sit and pierce your slit?

Don't fence sit - find camp, wallow in it.

Property sales, poll tax, miners axed, people sacked, many react. Ska attack.

Specials Jam Clash. Energy bash.

Gunpowder plotting, aiding, abetting. Cumplice to revolt.

Discuss within, argue without. Hegemony shifting under your feet.

Watch out! Ideas about.

Wow - what a decade!

...

Change of pace now, slowing down, dumbing down.

Down in the dumbed down noughties. Celebrity this, celebrity that and celebrity nothing. Cotton wool music, value-less dross.

Fence gone. One big pasture. What are you eating? Candy floss.

Population out to pasture under the sun. Diet of suntan and syrup.

Pasture in the peat bog. Sinking sands. Dragged deep down in the peat bog down, lowest common downominator.

Ideological lobotomy. Lazy lazy thinking, languid use of terms. Brainwashed into believing all you need is to believe. Live the dream. Want, borrow have. All works out in the end. Fingers crossed, lottery crossed, red lines crossed, cheques crossed.

Can we can have it all? Yes, and at no expense to your brain cells. Cheap at the price.

Thinking. Whats that? How does it work? Sounds painful? Don't do it.

Faria Alam: - "everyone deserves a second chance." First chance: Screw Sven. Second chance: Celebrity BB. Nuff said.

Dumbed right down. Panorama moved, meetings moved, its different now, modern now, easy now.

No thinking now, low interest now, full employment now. Alton Towers now, all happy now, New Labour now.

Why now? Why suddenly? What's new?

Sssshhhh don't think. You will wake the kids up.

BUT - actually, the biggest political demonstration in the history of the UK happened during the noughties.

I will say that again. THE LARGEST POLITICAL DEMONSTRATION IN THE TWO THOUSAND YEAR HISTORY OF BRITAIN TOOK PLACE DURING THE NOUGHTIES.

Reflect on that fact...

Reflect some more...

What does that mean? Was it the Indian summer? The final encore?

We went home. The smug cheshire cat carried on. Regardless.

And they wander why people have lost faith in politicians?

Why bother thinking when the biggest ever manifestion of collective praxis is so lightly tossed aside?

Its getting very near the end.

The eighties - best of times, the worst of times. We all had a ball.

The noughties - a vacuum of times. Perenial mush and and soft landing playgrounds. Nobody gets hurt. Emotion demotion slow motion promotion?

Who stole the passion? Where did it go?

It was all sucked up in credit card craze.

Globetrotting holidays, premier league glory days. Houses up anyways, can't go wrong with propertays.

From cool Brittania to smug Brittania.

Mark my weards, it will all end in tears.

All all our trousers will soon be Brown's.

THE END
...

Dear reader, a reading list will follow...

Dennis Watts - man of the eighties

Maputo

The best time of year. Razor sharp diurnal light. Blossoms out. Fresh morning edge obliges jacket and bica. And in case you have ever suffered here - God knows plenty have - remember tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena...

Ó mar salgado, quanto do teu sal
São lágrimas de Portugal!
Por te cruzarmos, quantas mães choraram,
Quantos filhos em vão rezaram!

Quantas noivas ficaram por casar
Para que fosses nosso, ó mar!
Valeu a pena? Tudo vale a pena
Se a alma não é pequena.

Quem quere passar além do Bojador
Tem que passar além da dor.
Deus ao mar o perigo e o abismo deu,
Mas nele é que espelhou o céu.

by Fernando Pessoa

Lugar do xirico cantador

New Year renewal

[read this out loud...]

Fighting gravity all the time,

we struggle and haggle along the line.

From adolescence to obsolescence

we greet the New Year chime.

[pause...]

New leaf, new page, new book, new lime,

But do we change? Your round or mine?

beerhead

The slow sinful sound of silence

Fear.

They say nothing;

They watch;

Quietly.

Cowardice defined, they let the river flow by.

Why?

Fear's why.

Fear is the biggest block to our emotional, spiritual and political growth: Fear of losing face; losing job; losing out; losing clothes; losing cash; losing in.

Now, there is no point in losing just for the sake of it. But is there respect for honourable loss? Paradox has this piece of advice for 2007. Lose the fear and you will find someone you have dreamt about, someone you knew when you were very young, someone you remember but are not sure where they have gone to. Lose your fear and find yourself.

Impetus

Get a move on Paradox, don't wait around.

Ten days without a post - not good, we've found.

Move it, move it, move and bound.

Jump it, screw it, flee the hound.

Hound of time, ticking sound.

ticking sound, counting down.

Ashes to ashes, dust to ground.

...................................................

Savour the moment, flee from fear

Time

Time is running out, Paradox is ageing

Hugo Chavez pointed out that we should only sleep four hours a day because there is so much to do. For him the Bolivarian Revolution is continuing the work of Jesus.

Viva America Latina. Like the feet of a salsa dancer it's all swirling around in his head, in hurry: Nationalism, socialism, christianity, helping the weak against the powerful, saving the human race against the rapacious demands of capitalism, stopping the US using the atomic bomb against Iran. Viva America Latina, Viva!

He is a man on the move, possessed with urgency, his body boils with fervour.

Yet, poetic. You cannot be a socialist if you cannot love... was one of his phrases.

Friend of Castro and the Pope, this eclectic guy is not easily boxed. Don't be dogmatic was his mantra. Don't have a motto; thats my motto.

The man was a performer, an artist, eyes twinkling he wowed his crowd. Chavez is a popular populist with a heart. He is personally offended by poverty. Government by moral imperative.

The devil is in the detail. How does this work on the ground?... I don't know and I need to find out. But the discourse is so different from that other oil rich nation, Angola.

There, dry eyed dinosours talk of development throught technology. Poverty is a technical issue not a moral one. Soaked in oil they cling to power, caressing and possessing it like a jealous lover. 30 years of combat has crusted their spirit and this rigid shell dulls the heart within.

Outside, the teeming Luanda masses audibly grumble. Literate and alive, they swing to the semba whilst picking their way through the sewage.

Luxurious ladies glide across Luanda in their Lexi. Perfumed down to the pubes and cocooned in air conditioning they prepare ...

... for what? Time is running out...

Luanda, the perfumed upon the pungent

Hugo Chavez

In quick succession Paradox has had the pleasure of personally perusing policies of nouveau-riche Angola and Venezuala.

Contrasts, sim senhor.

Interestingly, Chavez speaks a lot about this man.

What did he say at his recent London meet? watch this space...

Pubic hair

Paradox prises pleasure proximating palavras principating with P

It is called alliteration.

A fervent tropical forest. A mat of thick black scented grass. Hallowed turf.

Evokes tunnelled honey, emits earthly odours, elicits attention yet hides its object.

Inviting strolling fingers, or warning them against further progress.

What? Deforestation here as well?

Why oh why...

Save the rain forest

Pessimism

The defining quality of man is to make a mark.

From remote jungle to metropolitan bureacracy, men make marks. Stamp present.

Carimbar presença.

Paradox has seen freshly, proudly and innocently, cleared 'virgin' forest. Deflowered. Nicely tidied up.

It is what we do. We tidy things up, sort things out, and make our mark.

Suddenly, around 200 years ago, our ability to mark make began to increase exponentially. Imagine, the hull below was constructed well over a hundred years ago to tidy up mackerel for our plates.

A century of cleaning.

Parodox is a pessimist. We WILL destroy ourselves through our obsessive sorting and rearranging. I am sorry, it is inevitable.

In the meantime make merry, its later than you think.

Nicely made mark

Doomed

We are doomed. (ps. to the unitiated, look for John Laurie)

"Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will" is a phrase often attributed to Gramsci but in fact one he borrowed from Rolland.

Nevertheless, it requires further balance. Maybe optimism is merely naive human hope and endeavour?

Paradox prefers the following "Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will, fatalism of the inevitable"

And Paradox would like to append the word 'extinction' to the end of his version.

Why so dreary? All will be revealed tomorrow, in the meantime this picture provides a clue.

Aphrodisiac

Power is a great aphrodisiac.

But why? We know the famous and bizarre.

But why? This man answered, "Because I could."

Paradox was powerful once, in a big fish in small pond sort of way.

There was electrical static, effervescent glance and hormanal oozing. Yes, involuntary swelling accompanied adrenaline powered motion through busy pressured quotidian. Yes, there were remarkable, unsolicited, (and unrequieted) revelations: stretchings and reachings for uppermost shelved file .

And yes, later swimming as paradoxical minnow, power gone = electricity unplugged.

Ergo ego restored to humble normality.

Pleasant puritan Paradox was not pliantly pushed from purity. But why does this often happen?

Is it the selfish gene?

Courage

This is an eclectic blog of liquorice allsorts

There are postings and poems in english, portuguese and spanish

But how about this for cojones that take the biscuit...

click here for courage

Abridged consolance

Cut to the chase, my dear

Can't resume

Then waffle quick

Time?

Have none. Vomit now

C'est finit, ne verrai plus la petite morte avec lui

Twas ever thus, better to have loved and lost...

But pulped heart...

Will mend, make hay

Tiredness

That heavy itch of eye. That longing for bed. Goosepimples greet temperature variation. Sexual awareness raised, potency diminished. Procrastination and paralysis. Soaring imagination and flat application.

Tiredness is not a useful state of mind. Instinct takes over, decisions delayed. And a good thing too - no-one can decide tired.

Go to sleep.

Memorical

Today is international labour day. As an active organising pestering socialist I was utterly convinced of the inevitable forward march of labour, now halted I just sit and ponder...

What's is all about, Alfie?

Good question. What is it all about. Have you ever had years in your life when time seems to have stood still, one year on and you are still stood there? On the other hand, do you know the long weekend that seems to last a year, so much crammed into each second that the very measure of time expands to accomodate the moment?

I once saw a leopard in a Niassa forest, far away from any national park or zoo. We looked at each other for 2 seconds, or was it two years. A moment indelibly hard wired into my memory.

Now what about those years of depression, or should I say compression. Because reflection reduces the wasted months to minutes and then to seconds.

Hindsight balances the leopard second and the depression years with equal memorical weight. And what about that first glance of the forbidden or that recurring unrequieted sensuous lust? It never happened, yet it has memorical weight, a sort of memorical opportunity cost.

There seems to be a very loose connection between physical aging and mental maturing. They are connected as if by elastic, one can race ahead of the other, or one can lag behind. Only a sudden shock, or the honesty of the sleeping face, can relax the elastic to its resting point, combining the two in a temporary harmony. Once awake, the conscious mind returns to zig zag ahead or behind the slow march of dying cells, like a puppy wizzing around its master as he maintains a steady destinatory trajectory.

Memorical is a word invented by Paradox to signify the weight that reflection attributes to each remembered moment or set of moments.

Benguela and Brazil

Paradox is in London, feeling saudades for luminescent Lisbon.

Some Africans lament the Angolan propensity to gaze west rather than settle east. However there are reasons...

The remains of the quay that queued the chained forefathers of Pele, Ronaldo and Ronaldinho as they baked in anticipation of the passage into the setting sun. How many died waiting?


The bureacratic administration block where lives were signed away.


The church where the chainers prayed prior to plying their homo sapien merchandise westwards. Praying for forgiveness from Jesus?


The one and only Praia Morena (celebrated in song by Cessaria Evora, Chico Buarque, Paulo Flores et al) where the liberated descendents of homo sapien merchandise preyed upon the descendents of the chainers of the forefathers of Pele and Ronaldinho: The happy crucible of conception of countless mulattos.


Why the transformation from chained product to carnal partner...

Was it all a misunderstanding?

Or is it all down to the selfish gene?

A luz lisboeta

Escrevo banhado pela luz macia do Rossio madrugal.


I write bathed in the soft dawn light of Lisbon (in Rossio square)

(when I work out how to do it I shall post the Benguela pics)

Misunderstanding

Paradox is back!

Logging in the lobby of oil, diamonds and gold (watches).

The ruminations and cud chewing did not pause but cyberspace vaguaries in deepest nirvana delayed the divulgation of paradoxi.

The bus ride below (did you read it, dear readers?) is about a misunderstanding. How much of life is misunderstanding? All of it? Or most of it?

What about the baby born of one, the misconceived conception from the burst latex glove. A misunderstanding.

And what about the death bourne on one, the mistaken judgement from the nervous soldier, the tired driver or the zealous jury. A misunderstanding.

What if the life created through misunderstanding is also ended through misunderstanding?

How much do you really know?

All we know for certain is that we are likely to be wrong.

Dear reader, how dare you be so presumptious as to pre-judge anything. Prejudice is to prejudge.

Remember... we never know.

Next up on Paradox, the Paulo Flores peregrination continues... in Benguela, and with pictures.

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

To close, do you know the expression - to chew the cud? Have you ever wandered where it comes from? Digest two examples...

Which sentiment being a pretty hard morsel, and bearing something of the air of a paradox, we shall leave the reader to chew the cud upon it to the end of the chapter.

The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling by Fielding, Henry

Read more of this quote...

During the long summer day, as his sheep cropped the good grass which the gods had made to grow for them, or lay with their forelegs doubled under their breasts and chewed the cud, Haita, reclining in the shadow of a tree, or sitting upon a rock, played so sweet music upon his reed pipe that sometimes from the corner of his eye he got accidental glimpses of the minor sylvan deities, leaning forward out of the copse to hear; but if he looked at them directly they vanished.

Can Such Things Be? by Bierce, Ambrose

read more of this quote...

Benguela

Paradox is in Benguela, where the web connection is atrocious.

The bus ride

Dear Reader, you were promised a post on iraq, here it is.

I invite you to read the following:

bus ride

The selfish gene speaks

You read it here first! As soon as Paradox posted yesterday's post, the BBC decided to investigate. Look what they found.... can you spot the mention of the selfish gene?

Dear reader, I invite you to read the story below, read the post below that, and smile. Then check back later, because the next post on Paradox is about Iraq.

STORY FROM THE BBC

Catching sight of a pretty woman really is enough to throw a man's decision-making skills into disarray, a study has found.

The more testosterone he has, the vaguer he will be, according to work by Belgian researchers.

Men about to play a financial game were shown images of sexy women or lingerie.

The Proceedings of the Royal Society B study found they performed worse than men who had not been exposed to the alluring images.

The suggestion is that the sexual cues distract the men's thoughts, preventing them from focusing on their task - particularly among those with high natural testosterone levels.

The University of Leuven researchers gave 176 heterosexual male student volunteers aged 18 to 28 financial games to test their fair play.

But first, half of the men were shown sexual cues of some kind.

One group of 44 men were given pictures to rate; some were shown landscapes while the rest were shown attractive women.

Another group, of 37 men, were either asked to assess the quality, texture and colour of a bra or a t-shirt.

And a third group of 95 were shown either pictures of elderly women or young models.

Each group was then paired up to play a game where the men had $10, a proposer had to suggest a split, and the other man accepted or rejected the offer.

If the second man accepted the offer, the money was distributed in agreement with the offer. If he rejected it, neither partner got anything.

The game is designed as a lab model of hunting or food sharing situations.

'Vulnerable'

The men's performance in the tests showed those who had been exposed to the "sexual cues" were more likely to accept an unfair offer than those who were not.

The men's testosterone levels were also tested - by comparing the length of the men's index finger compared to their ring finger.

If the ring finger is longest, it indicates a high testosterone level.

The researchers found that men in the study who had the highest levels performed worst in the test, and suggest that is because they are particularly sensitive to sexual images.

Dr Siegfried DeWitte, one of the researchers who worked on the study, said: "We like to think we are all rational beings, but our research suggests ... that people with high testosterone levels are very vulnerable to sexual cues.

"If there are no cues around, they behave normally.

"But if they see sexual images they become impulsive."

He added: "It's a tendency, but these people are not powerless to fight it.

"Hormone levels are one thing, but we can learn to deal with it."

The researchers are conducting similar tests with women. But so far, they have failed to find a visual stimulus which will affect their behaviour."

Dr George Fieldman, principal lecturer in psychology at Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, told the BBC News website: "The fact men are distracted by sexual cues fits in to evolutionary experience. It's what they are expected to do.

"They are looking for opportunities to pass on their genes."

He said the study confirmed what had been suspected by many.

"If a man is being asked to choose between something being presented by an attractive woman and an ugly men, they might not as able as they might be to be dispassionate."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/health/4921690.stm

Published: 2006/04/19 11:14:22 GMT

© BBC MMVI

Infertility

So much of life is about reproduction. ‘The Selfish Gene’ suggests that the whole of life is essentially a programme through which we facilitate the passage of our genes from one generation to the next. According to this thesis, the ‘selfish gene’ subconsciously influences every decision we make. In our choice of partner, of home, of career, of what to do this afternoon, the selfish gene makes sure that we are swayed in its direction. Are you attracted to that man / woman you see every day in the shop? The selfish gene is fooling you, after all what has he / she done for you apart from smile? Linking up with that individual might be the worse decision you ever make.

But the selfish gene is eyeing up that smile, those clear eyes, that nice body. Hmmm it thinks, that looks healthy, I could do with teaming up with the DNA in that. The gene is truly selfish, it doesn't care about your marital status, it just wants to use you to link up with as much DNA as it can.

So much of everyday chat is about reproduction and its consequences. Families, children and grandchildren. Whenever relatives want to strike up a conversation it is often the first thing they turn to. So, how are you doing Paradox? What they are really asking is - How goes it in the great game of reproduction?

After a while it gets you down. You don’t really have an answer. You are not really part of it all. You are not playing the game but you are watching from the sidelines. Once a player has been red carded, the selfish gene within realises that it is not going to be transported after all. Angry and frustrated it turns upon its host and consumes him / her from within. Just what is the point? There is none if you are not a player in the game.

Careers, holidays, obsessions, hobbies, ambitions, principles and beliefs. These are things that attempt to supplant the selfish gene. They try to get in its way, offering an alternative. Try us, they say, and you will see that there is more to life than serving the selfish gene. You do try to jump aboard – you apply all sorts of techniques to convince yourself that your presence on the planet amounts to more than a simple vehicle to allow the selfish gene another generational passage. Surely your presence is more than a back over which the selfish gene can leapfrog.

But is it? Careers, holidays, obsessions, hobbies, ambitions, principles and beliefs. Players of the game also follow these. Indeed players can argue that in a small way they are doing their bit to make life easier for their assorted progeny. Whether right or left, socialist or capitalist, Christian or Islamic, poet or mathematician, they all love their kids and believe that they are ‘doing good’. The smiles of the little ones to convince them that they are ‘right’ and fortify them in their daily battles. The intergenerational transporters of the gene feel good because they are doing their duty to pass it on. That’s all there is to life! The rest is just a vain attempt to keep up with the Jones’s and to cover up the emptiness they feel once their job is done and their offspring have departed, taking the gene with them for safe passage. Of course, it comes back again in the form of grandchildren, making the player feel that he or she really has done their duty.

But spare a thought for the childless. We don’t play in this game. What is our role?

We don’t have one. And we know it...

Its all a matter of perspective.

Jesus, the last word

We will be leaving this topic today and departing for pastures new. If I have stirred your interest I suggest you explore the following links:

1. A lot of stuff on the historical Jesus, showing the different schools of thought.

2. A very interesting site, for some reason not included above, but one that has the most logical explanation that I have found so far.

It is also the most logical explanation I am likely to find, because the train is leaving the station. Dear Reader, will you join me on the ride to blisdom?

(Blisdom - a word introduced to the English language by Paradox, meaning synthesis of bliss and blog wisdom)

Jesus, still

As promised, on Easter Sunday (for the western churches at least), we have the Jesus quest. Today, millions of people will celebrate the resurrection of Jesus.

Did this happen? And was Jesus crucified?

The search for the 'historical Jesus' was a hot topic around the turn of the 19th Century. It picked up again recently. There are some big problems with Jesus.

1. The Romans kept records. Civil Registry, births, marriages and deaths. Many people are known to have existed around Jesus' time. Including John theBaptist, King Herod, Pontius Pilate etc. But there are no records of Jesus. There are no records of the order from king Herod that led the family to leave Nazareth for Bethlehem, there are no records of the trial of Jesus and no records of his crucifixion.

2. Temporal inconsistencies. These characters (John the Baptist, King Herod, Pontius Pilate and the contempories) lived at different times. It appears that it would have been very difficult for Jesus to have led the life he is supposed to have led because the dates don't fit.

3. Geographical inconsistencies. We know a lot about the geography of the ancient middle east. The Romans had maps. Some of the places in the bible don't seem to have existed then, others are so far apart (and in different countries) that it would have been impossible for Jesus to have travelled between them during the time it was supposed to have taken him.

4. Anecdotal inconsistencies. The stories about Jesus (Paul, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) do not add up. They do not agree with each other and were written a long time after Jesus' death. The writings of Paul are the earliest. He was in Jerusalem a few years after Jesus' death and met Jesus' brother. He does not talk about the life of Jesus per se, but refers to a 'Christ crucified'. Mark is the next one, written around 30 years after Jesus died. Who Mark is we don't know. Then follow Matthew (who some think wrote before Mark) and Luke (who some think was a woman). We have no idea who these people are (or even if they existed as individual 'people'; any one of the Gospels could have been written by a group of people joining their ideas together. Mark, Matthew and Luke tell more or less the same Jesus story and are known as the synoptic Gospels. Finally John's gospel is totally different, was written a lot later, and adds lots of new material. There were other gospels, but only these four were included by the leaders of the early church. It is unlikely that any of these writers actually met Jesus. Paul arrived after his death, and the others would have been extremely old men, (even over 100) if they were adults when Jesus was alive and then kept their memories for between 20 - 100 years before writing them down. Therefore is likely that the Gospel writers, (but not Paul), were writing down stories they had heard, and not giving eye-witness accounts.

What are the responses to this?

1. So what? Some accept these points but say that it does not matter, the very fact of the church today and the millions of believers means that something pretty big did happen.

2. Minimal Jesus. Others have constructed a minimal life of Jesus, and argue that actually people like John the Baptist were the bigger stars of the time. It may be that Jesus was crucified but without a full trial. He was a symbol of a wider movement and set of beliefs, and he became an icon. However his personal importance (and that of Mary etc) was embellished later as the church grew and developed its story.

3. No Jesus. There was not a person called Jesus who did the things he was supposed to have done. Instead there were a number of things going on, and there was a messianic movement of that time. John the Baptist was an important leader. The early Christians grew out of this period and the idea of 'Christ crucified' was meant to be symbolic and not literal. Only later on did the church gradually develop this idea into the life of a real Jesus. (remember the first bibles appeared well over a hundred years after the death of Jesus).

[It is interesting to note that the Koran, written around 500 years after the death of Jesus, is different. The Koran involves a real historical figure - the Prophet Mohamed - and there is no historical doubt surrounding his existence. However it also includes stories about Jesus as one of the earlier prophets, as well as giving an interpretation of the whole bible story, from Adam and Eve to Moses, Abraham etc.]

I am not a religious person, however I find it interesting that Christians are divided on these issues. For some it doesn't really matter if Jesus did this or that, or even if he lived at all, what is important are the morals behind the message. However others will defend to the death the literal truth of every miracle and word.

What do you think?

Happy Easter

Jesus, again

But did Jesus exist? In Christian countries we need Him even if we don't believe in Him. We need to feel that this nice, kind, smiling, forgiving soul was around. This person who turned the other cheek and who loved his neighbour as himself. We like to think that with our dying breath we will acknowledge Him in his infinite forgiveness. Whatever we have done, he will understand. And we will fade away smiling, looking forward to meeting his outstretched arms on the other side.

But what if he never existed? I mean what if he never existed as an historical fact. What if there never was a Jesus of Nazereth?

Unfortunately, this might be the case. Looking for the meaning of Easter I have come across some extra-ordinary information and suddenly the world is different. My conclusion can only be this...

Either Jesus never existed, or he was a lesser figure than we imagine, and he was built up into a symbolic icon by the early Christians. Some thinking Christians are happy with this, they see Jesus as a symbol, just as Adam and Eve are symbols. They do not really need to believe that there ever was a Jesus person who ate, slept and went to the toilet.

When I get time I will briefly post more on this. But I don't want this blog to get sidetracked into a religious one.

One thing is true though. Just think of the implications of Jesus never having existed. What does that mean for Islam, for Christianity?